| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 7671 - 7675 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Mariyamu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Nazar regarding rent control

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.55 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-06-20

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mariyamu et al vs Babu Parammal regarding lease and rent control

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.58 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-06-20

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunheethutty et al vs Rafeekh regarding eviction

Eviction under Rent Control Act

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 72 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-08-03

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Theyyambattil Muhammed vs Chatheri Hassan Haji's Children et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit - Partition

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. .1235 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-06-19

8 years 3 months

Petitioner

View Full Details

Case between Shanavas vs Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. et al regarding restoration application

Civil Suit - Restoration Application

Restor.Pt 3523/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-19

1 year, 6 months, 2 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs consistently failed to pay the required court fees (batta), leading to dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence provided to demonstrate the financial standing or means of respondents resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners frequently failed to appear in court, which led to automatic case dismissals for default.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice to Respondents

Petitioners often neglected to issue required notices to defendants, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notice to Respondents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?