| Niyamam AI

Displaying 966 - 970 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sony K Thomas vs Sushama.P.K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 899/2017

Ernakulam

2025-08-23

approximately-8 years 4 months 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between B.K. Santha vs Surjith regarding rent control

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 156/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gilroy Mendez vs M/s Bhagyodayam Company Ltd. regarding modification of injunction order

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 450/2019

Ernakulam

2025-07-02

approximately-6 years 9 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between P.C.Samkutty vs Safarudheen K.A. et al regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 170/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-02

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Subash Tola vs Maju P.S. regarding Rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 86/2023

Ernakulam

2025-07-07

approximately-1 month 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear or have representation during hearings, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Petition 'Not Pressed' by Plaintiff

Many plaintiffs did not pursue their petitions, resulting in dismissals due to lack of action.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Case

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence or prove their legal claims, causing dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Lack of Jurisdiction

Some cases were dismissed as the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the claims presented.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petition 'Not Pressed' by Plaintiff

Failure to Prove Case

Lack of Jurisdiction

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?