Case Summary
Subash Tola filed a petition against Maju P.S. for not complying with a rent payment order. The respondent was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner to be put in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the building due to non-compliance with the rent order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order.
The respondent failed to comply with the order.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the order.
The respondent failed to comply with the order.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 3/2025 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subash Tola
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Maju P.S.
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Kanam Assignment deed No.4643/2013, Tax receipt
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N. Ratheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Raj Kamal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Joseph Mary Das
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anu Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ansila P.B.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Subash Tola vs Maju P.S. regarding Rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Subash Tola vs Maju P.S. regarding Rent control petition