R.C.P. No. 156/2024

Case between B.K. Santha vs Surjith regarding rent control

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

B.K. Santha filed a petition against Surjith under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The court allowed the interim application and closed the proceedings in the rent control petition due to the respondent's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court favored the petitioner, allowing the interim application and closing the rent control petition due to the absence of the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court favored the petitioner, allowing the interim application and closing the rent control petition due to the absence of the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

IA No.10/2025 allowed (VSO) and order is passed under Section 12 (3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. Further proceedings in rent control petition closed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
B.K. Santha
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Surjith
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Control Petition, Vakalath, petition related documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
J. Asokan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
K.J.Gladis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Dr. Abhilash O.U.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Anish Raj O.U.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Unnikrishna Pillai P.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Fathimath Semina
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
IA No.10/2025 allowed
Evidence:
IA No.10/2025 allowed (VSO) and order is passed under Section 12 (3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between B.K. Santha vs Surjith regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between B.K. Santha vs Surjith regarding rent control

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Greeshma vs Shaija Saji regarding rent control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Mr. Thomas Jose Pallan vs Ms. Megha M.B. regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between V.G.Divakaran vs T.G.Mohanan regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Bose John vs SNA Oushadhasala Pvt. Ltd et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Mathew Ninan et al vs Sujith P.S. et al regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won