Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 170/2023

Case between Mr. Thomas Jose Pallan vs Ms. Megha M.B. regarding Rent Control

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration
approximately-2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. Thomas Jose Pallan filed a rent control petition against Ms. Megha M.B. for non-compliance with a previous order regarding rent arrears. The court found that the respondent did not comply with the order and directed that the petitioner be put in possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering the respondent to vacate the premises due to non-compliance with the previous order.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Put in vacant possession of the building forthwith
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order regarding payment of rent arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mr. Thomas Jose Pallan (51 years) Pallans Villa, 33/1798, Elamakkara, Edappally South Village, Erankulam, Pin-682 026

Defendants

Ms. Megha M.B. (Age not specified years) Meera Madiar, Anakkara P.O. Palakkad, Pin-679 551

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases