Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 40/2024

Case between Indira Chacko et al vs Irshad C.I. regarding Rent Control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-06
Duration
approximately-1 year 8 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Indira Chacko and her daughter Smitha Chacko filed a petition against Irshad C.I. for failure to pay rent and unauthorized alterations in the leased property. The court examined the evidence and granted relief to the petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, directing the respondent to hand over possession of the property to the petitioners within 30 days. The court also granted costs to the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, directing the respondent to hand over possession of the property to the petitioners within 30 days. The court also granted costs to the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established their case with unimpeached evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners established their case with unimpeached evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Ext A1 to A6 and Ext C1 and C1(a) established his case as pleaded by him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) 11(4)(v) of the Act with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indira Chacko
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smitha Chacko
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Irshad C.I.
Party Age
46
Plaintiffs Documents
Original power of attorney dated 28.12.2023, Certified copy of O.S. No. 873/2023, Copy of lawyer's notice dated 07.10.2023, Copy of complaint filed before the Palarivattom police station.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.P. Wilson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) 11(4)(v) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section and 11(2)(b) and 11(4)(v) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the authority of the petitioners' Power of Attorney Holder to file the petition.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of OS
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of a prior case filed by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the respondent regarding the arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the receipt of the lawyer's notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the petitioners filed a complaint against the respondent for unauthorized alterations.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Receipt for Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence that the complaint was filed.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report provides details of the commission appointed in the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This sketch was appended to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The court considered the oral testimony of the petitioner as part of the evidence.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Indira Chacko et al vs Irshad C.I. regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Indira Chacko et al vs Irshad C.I. regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 12/28/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between K. Sattanathan vs K.K. Mohanan regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. P.K.Abdul Ghafoor memorial MES Cultural Complex, Kaloor, Kochi vs SPR Perfumes et al regarding Rent Arrears
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Thomas Jose Pallan vs Ms. Megha M.B. regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Bose John vs SNA Oushadhasala Pvt. Ltd et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won