Case Summary
The petitioner Greeshma filed a rent control petition against the respondent Shaija Saji. The respondent has vacated the premises, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was dismissed as the respondent vacated the property.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Thus rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Greeshma
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaija Saji
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K. Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.S. Sunil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed due to the respondent vacating the building.
Evidence:
Thus rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Greeshma vs Shaija Saji regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Greeshma vs Shaija Saji regarding rent control