Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 170/2024

Case between P.C.Samkutty vs Safarudheen K.A. et al regarding Rent Control

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.C.Samkutty filed a rent control petition against Safarudheen K.A. and Hafiz Hamza. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the respondent vacated the petition schedule building.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed due to non-representation from the petitioner after the respondent vacated the premises.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The respondent vacated the premises, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

P.C.Samkutty (64 years years) Ashish Villa, Elavakattu Nagar, Thrikkakara P.O., Kakkanadu-Vazhakkala Village, Kanayannoore Taluk of Ernakulam District- 682 030

Defendants

Safarudheen K.A (30 years years) Kadamattumoolayil House, Peringala P.O., Pinarmunda Kunnathunadu Taluk-683 565 now at Room No. 12/613, Navajeevan Tower, Kuzhikkattumoola, Kakkanad, Thrikkakara Municipality Limit, Kakkandad P.O. 682 030 Hafiz Hamza (30 years years) Pallichira House, Karimughal P.O., Puthencruz-682 301, Kunnathunadu Taluk now at Room No. 12/613, Navajeevan Tower, Kuzhikkattumoola, Kakkanad, Thrikkakara Municipality Limit, Kakkandad P.O. 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is not pressed due to the respondent vacating the petition schedule building and surrendering its possession.
Evidence:
Petitioner no representation. Memo seen filed by the learned counsel for petitioner who filed vakalath stating that respondent vacated the petition schedule building and surrendered its possession and hence the rent control petition is not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases