R.C.P. No. 170/2024

Case between P.C.Samkutty vs Safarudheen K.A. et al regarding Rent Control

Court

COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.

Order Date

2025-07-02

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.C.Samkutty filed a rent control petition against Safarudheen K.A. and Hafiz Hamza. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the respondent vacated the petition schedule building.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The rent control petition was dismissed due to non-representation from the petitioner after the respondent vacated the premises.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control

Final Judgment

The rent control petition was dismissed due to non-representation from the petitioner after the respondent vacated the premises.

Key Reasoning:
The respondent vacated the premises, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Why Defendant Won:
The respondent vacated the premises, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Supporting Evidence

Petitioner no representation. Memo seen filed by the learned counsel for petitioner who filed vakalath stating that respondent vacated the petition schedule building and surrendered its possession.

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: P.C.Samkutty
Party Age: 64
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Safarudheen K.A
Party Age: 30
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Hafiz Hamza
Party Age: 30
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Rental agreement, Vakalath

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: John Joseph
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The rent control petition is not pressed due to the respondent vacating the petition schedule building and surrendering its possession.

Evidence:

Petitioner no representation. Memo seen filed by the learned counsel for petitioner who filed vakalath stating that respondent vacated the petition schedule building and surrendered its possession and hence the rent control petition is not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification