| Niyamam AI

Displaying 901 - 905 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Sapna shaffi regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 54/2020

Ernakulam

2024-08-07

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Santhosh Paul vs M/s. Jibu & Thomas Projects Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Rent Control.

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 126/2023

Ernakulam

2024-08-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hashim N.M. vs N.C. Abdul Salim regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 96/2023

Ernakulam

2024-08-19

approximately-1 year 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Santhosh Paul vs M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects regarding Rent Control petition

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 125/2023

Ernakulam

2024-08-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Smt. Padmaja Narayanankutty et al vs M/s. Ray's Travel Bureau et al regarding Rent Control petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 117/2022

Ernakulam

2024-08-30

approximately-2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiffs

Numerous cases dismissed due to plaintiffs' absence during hearings, leading to defaults.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Petitions Not Pressed

Many petitions dismissed as not pressed by counsel, indicating a lack of prosecutorial effort.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present sufficient evidence, resulting in dismissal of their claims.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Case

Plaintiffs did not establish their claims, leading courts to dismiss petitions.

Found in 11 cases (11%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiffs

Petitions Not Pressed

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Prove Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?