Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 125/2023

Case between Santhosh Paul vs M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects regarding Rent Control petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Santhosh Paul filed a Rent Control petition against M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects. The parties have entered into a compromise which is found lawful by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the Rent Control petition as per the terms of the compromise. The terms are lawful and will form part of the order.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful and voluntarily entered.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA 07/2024 is allowed. Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Santhosh Paul (59 years) C-26, Nizamuddin, East, New Delhi, Pin-110 013

Defendants

M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects (Age not specified years) G-173, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi-682030 Mr. Jibu John (52 years) G-173, Panmpilly Nagar, Kochi-682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence IA 07/2024 is allowed. Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Corporation

Similar Cases