Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 125/2023

Case between Santhosh Paul vs M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects regarding Rent Control petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Santhosh Paul filed a Rent Control petition against M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects. The parties have entered into a compromise which is found lawful by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the Rent Control petition as per the terms of the compromise. The terms are lawful and will form part of the order.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the Rent Control petition as per the terms of the compromise. The terms are lawful and will form part of the order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful and voluntarily entered.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful and voluntarily entered.
Supporting Evidence
Heard both sides in IA 07/2024. Perused the terms in the compromise and it reflect that the parties entered into the compromise terms voluntarily and the terms are found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA 07/2024 is allowed. Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhosh Paul
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Jibu John
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Basil Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanjana Sara Varghese Annie
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ninan John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arya A.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suja R. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thresia Anup J.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence IA 07/2024 is allowed. Rent control petition is allowed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Santhosh Paul vs M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects regarding Rent Control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Santhosh Paul vs M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects regarding Rent Control petition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Corporation

Similar Cases

Case between Mayjoe Cherian vs Sravan.K.Nath regarding Rent Control Petition
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Renu Krishnan vs Mahija Vijayan regarding tenancy and eviction
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Philomina Varghese et al vs K R Elizebeth regarding injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between M.P. Somashekaran Pillai vs Sajikumar.S. regarding landlord-tenant dispute
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Petition filed under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 Plaintiff Won
Case between K.I. Subair Mather et al vs Kadeeja Majeed et al regarding eviction
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Petition under Section 11(4)(v) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 Plaintiff Won