Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1043 /2019

Case between Philomina Varghese et al vs K R Elizebeth regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-09-24
Duration
approximately-6 years 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Philomina Varghese and others, plaintiffs, seeking an injunction against K R Elizebeth, who claims rights over certain quarters. Elizebeth, a contingent worker, argues against her eviction from the quarters she has occupied since 2013.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition to implead K R Elizebeth as an additional defendant. The presence of the petitioner was deemed unnecessary for adjudicating the issues in the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the presence of the petitioner was not necessary to resolve the main disputes of ownership and possession.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Philomina Varghese (62 years years) Parathara House, Carrier Station Road, Ernakulam South, Kochi- 682016 Sunil Kumar K A (40 years years) Kilikkodan Parambu House, Carrier Station Road, Ernakulam South, Kochi- 682016 Antony B (49 years years) Karakkattu House, Carrier Station Road, Ernakulam South, Kochi- 682016 Susheela Devassy (74 years years) Naduvilae Parambil House, Carrier Station Road, Ernakulam South, Kochi- 682016 The Corporation of Kochi (Age not specified years) Ernakulam, Kochi- 682011

Defendants

K R Elizebeth (47 years years) Quarter No. 456 in Ward No. 57 of Ezhumuri Colony, Career Station Road, Kochi- 682016

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition to implead petitioner as additional 3rd defendant in the suit.
Evidence:
Therefore satisfied that presence of petitioner is not necessary for the adjudicating the matters in dispute in suit and a valid decree can be passed without the presences of petitioner herein.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Corporation

Similar Cases