Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No.55/2023

Case between M.P. Somashekaran Pillai vs Sajikumar.S. regarding landlord-tenant dispute

Court
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Landlord petitioned to evict tenant for default in rent payment, property damage, engaging in unlawful activities, and abandonment of premises. Tenant failed to appear, leading to ex parte judgment in favor of petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Petitioner granted possession of the property with costs against the tenant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition filed under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
Petitioner granted possession of the property with costs against the tenant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner provided evidence of rent arrears, property damage, and breach of rental agreement which remained uncontroverted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner provided evidence of rent arrears, property damage, and breach of rental agreement which remained uncontroverted.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.P. Somashekaran Pillai
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajikumar.S.
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of the rent agreement, Copy of Lawyer's notice, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Tenant to put the landlord in possession of the building within 30 days
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b), 11(3), 11(4)(i), 11(4)(ii) and and 11(4)(v) of the Act
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner entitled to costs of the petition from the respondent
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the rent agreement dated 01.10.2022, marked subject to proof
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice dated 16.03.2023
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt
Reference:
Document Type: Commercial Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report in IA 02/2022 by Adv.Tinu Treasa M.G.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Petition filed under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M.P. Somashekaran Pillai vs Sajikumar.S. regarding landlord-tenant dispute
Case Code Year
Case between M.P. Somashekaran Pillai vs Sajikumar.S. regarding landlord-tenant dispute

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Corporation

Similar Cases

Case between Mayjoe Cherian vs Sravan.K.Nath regarding Rent Control Petition
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Renu Krishnan vs Mahija Vijayan regarding tenancy and eviction
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh Paul vs M/s. Jibu & Thomas Architects regarding Rent Control petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Philomina Varghese et al vs K R Elizebeth regarding injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between K.I. Subair Mather et al vs Kadeeja Majeed et al regarding eviction
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Petition under Section 11(4)(v) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 Plaintiff Won