Case Summary
The petitioner, Hashim N.M., filed a rent control petition against the respondent, N.C. Abdul Salim, for non-compliance with a previous order regarding rent arrears. The court addressed the failure of the respondent to comply with the order to deposit the rent, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the rent order and consequently ordered the stoppage of further proceedings, granting possession of the property to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not comply with the court order for payment of rent.
The respondent did not comply with the court order for payment of rent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not comply with the court order for payment of rent.
The respondent did not comply with the court order for payment of rent.
Supporting Evidence
The tenant becomes fully aware that unless sufficient cause has been shown for default committed, the consequence of stoppage of the proceedings and direction to put the landlord in possession would follow automatically.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hashim N.M.
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N.C. Abdul Salim
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Unise Mohamed Kunju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Basil Chandy Vavachan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hashim N.M. vs N.C. Abdul Salim regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Hashim N.M. vs N.C. Abdul Salim regarding rent control petition