Case Summary
The petitioners, Smt. Padmaja Narayanankutty and others, filed a Rent Control petition against the respondents, including M/s. Ray's Travel Bureau and its proprietor. The case was about compliance with previous court orders and closure of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the interim application and closed the Rent Control petition as per the provisions of the Act.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Interim application was allowed due to non-compliance by the respondents.
Interim application was allowed due to non-compliance by the respondents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Interim application was allowed due to non-compliance by the respondents.
Interim application was allowed due to non-compliance by the respondents.
Supporting Evidence
The court granted the request based on the absence and non-compliance of the respondents.
Judgment Evidence:
IA 05/2024 is allowed (VSO) an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act, Rent control petition is closed accordingly.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Smt. Padmaja Narayanankutty
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sri. Anoop Narayananankutty
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sri. Anil Narayanankutty
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Ray's Travel Bureau
- Relation
- represented by Its Proprietor Sri. Mohammed Ali
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sri. Mohammed Ali
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of non compliance of orders in IA 04/2023
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mathew Skaria
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Tomy Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thomas Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muntaz Shamsudhdin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajith M. Jiji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Alisha Aslam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
IA 05/2024 is allowed and an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act.
Evidence:
IA 05/2024 is allowed (VSO) an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act, Rent control petition is closed accordingly.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Violation of lease conditions
Case Code
Case between Smt. Padmaja Narayanankutty et al vs M/s. Ray's Travel Bureau et al regarding Rent Control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Smt. Padmaja Narayanankutty et al vs M/s. Ray's Travel Bureau et al regarding Rent Control petition