| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 551 - 555 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Tharammal Suheela vs M.A.Hussain regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

EP 162/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-26

0 years, 3 months, 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohammed Moideen vs P. Aboobacker regarding eviction

Eviction under Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 36 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-23

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kuruppanthoduvil Sainudheen et al vs Nalakath Ashid regarding rent arrears and eviction

Rent Control Petition - Eviction

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 10 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-21

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kainikkara Abdurahiman vs Edasseri Ibrahim's children et al regarding fair rent fixation

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 25 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-10-04

2 years 11 month 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ummakya et al vs Chandaparambil Alibava Haji et al regarding eviction and injunction

Civil Suit - Eviction and Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 281 OF 2003

Tirur

2017-10-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs were frequently absent during hearings, leading to dismissals for default without representation.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Not Pressed by Counsel

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs' counsels decided not to press the cases or failed to represent their clients.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence or documentation to support their claims or establish legal grounds.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Failure to Comply with Procedures

Dismissals frequently occurred due to non-compliance with court procedures, including filing issues and not paying necessary fees.

Found in 9 cases (9%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Not Pressed by Counsel

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Comply with Procedures

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?