Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 4 OF 2019

Case between V.A.Safiya vs Kunnath Kunhimon regarding eviction of tenant for non-payment of rent

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

V.A.Safiya has filed a petition against Kunnath Kunhimon for eviction due to non-payment of rent since January 2018. The petitioner claims to require the building for her daughter's residence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the eviction petition, directing the respondent to vacate the building within three months. The petitioner is also entitled to recover costs from the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction from the building and costs of the petition.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a bona fide need for the building for her daughter's residence and the evidence was unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed under Ss. 11 (2), 11 (3) and 11(4) (ii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act as follows: I. The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building bearing No. XXIII/113A to the petitioner within three months from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

V.A.Safiya (52 years years) Cheedha Madathil Veedu, Thrikkandiyur amsom, Thekkumuri desom & Post, Tirur Taluk – 676105 Abdul Muneer (41 years years) Athanikkal House, Alathiyur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Kunnath Kunhimon (53 years years) “Gazal” House, South Annara, P.O.Tirur, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is granted an order for eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
I find that the petitioner is entitled to get an order of eviction under 11 (2), 11 (3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to realise the cost of the proceedings from the respondent.
Evidence:
So the petitioner is entitled to realise the cost of the proceedings from respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document was issued to demand the surrender of vacant possession of the building with arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the lawyer notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment card indicates the respondent received the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A1(c)

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Sun, 07/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases