Case Summary
The petitioners, including Mohamed Noushad and P. Saleena, filed for eviction of the respondents, Abdul Majeed and Mohammed Askar, asserting that the respondents sublet the property without permission and that the petitioner needs the property for his grandson to start a business. The case alleges misuse of the property and failure to comply with eviction notices.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondents directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building within three months.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners provided credible evidence of their bona fide need for the property, and the respondents failed to contest.
The petitioners provided credible evidence of their bona fide need for the property, and the respondents failed to contest.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under Ss. 11 (3), 11 (4) (1) and 11(4) (ii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act as follows: I The respondents are directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building bearing No. XX/995 of the Tirur Municipality to the petitioners within three months from today.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Mohamed Noushad (50 years)
Menothil Pooparambil House, Tirur amsom Kott desom, Tirur Taluk. PIN - 676 101
P. Saleena (40 years)
Menothil Pooparambil House
Mohammed Dilbar (19 years)
Menothil Pooparambil House
Defendants
Abdul Majeed (50 years)
Kodapeediyakkal, Rayirimangalam amsom Tanur desom, & Post, PIN - 676 302
Mohammed Askar (50 years)
Kadavath House, Thrikkandiyoor amsom Annara desom, P.O. Tirur, PIN - 676 101
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order of eviction against the respondents to vacate the building.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the petitioner has proved her case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Entitlement to realize the costs of the petition from the respondents.
Evidence:
the petitioner is entitled to realise the cost of the proceedings from respondents.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to demand the surrender of vacant possession of the building.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of sending the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type:
Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A1(c)
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner detailing the condition of the building.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Plan submitted by Advocate Commissioner related to the building.
Reference:
Ext.C2