Case Summary
Two petitioners Shabna and Samitha, represented by a Power of Attorney Holder, filed a petition against the respondent Mohamedkutty seeking vacant possession of the room as per the compromise agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Entitled to file Execution Petition for delivery if vacant position not given by respondent
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court allowed the petition as the terms of the compromise were lawful.
The court allowed the petition as the terms of the compromise were lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the petition is allowed as per the terms.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Shabna (30 years)
Kizhakepeediyekkal House, Mangalam amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 561
Samitha (26 years)
Kizhakepeediyekkal House, Mangalam amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 561
Defendants
Mohamedkutty (56 years)
Muttath House, Ullanam amsom, desom, Tirurangadi taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Entitled to file Execution Petition for delivery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to file an Execution Petition for delivery if the respondent fails to provide vacant possession of the scheduled room.
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the petition is allowed as per the terms.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Represented the petitioners in the case.
Reference: