Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 88 OF 2016

Case between Shabna et al vs Mohamedkutty regarding rent control

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-03
Duration
1 year 11 months 18 days
Case Closed
Sat, 03/03/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Two petitioners Shabna and Samitha, represented by a Power of Attorney Holder, filed a petition against the respondent Mohamedkutty seeking vacant possession of the room as per the compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition based on the terms of the compromise agreement, entitling the petitioners to vacant possession of the scheduled room if the respondent fails to comply.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Entitled to file Execution Petition for delivery if vacant position not given by respondent
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition based on the terms of the compromise agreement, entitling the petitioners to vacant possession of the scheduled room if the respondent fails to comply.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court allowed the petition as the terms of the compromise were lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court allowed the petition as the terms of the compromise were lawful.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the petition is allowed as per the terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shabna
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o. Abdulla
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Samitha
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o. Abdulla
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohamedkutty
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o. Kunheen
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Entitled to file Execution Petition for delivery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to file an Execution Petition for delivery if the respondent fails to provide vacant possession of the scheduled room.
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the petition is allowed as per the terms.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Represented the petitioners in the case.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Shabna et al vs Mohamedkutty regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Shabna et al vs Mohamedkutty regarding rent control

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 03/03/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/03/2018 - 12:00
From
Thu, 03/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Sat, 03/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Ajith Kumar.U. regarding rent dispute
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Both (settled)
Case between Beeran Haji vs Habeeb Rehman regarding rent control
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won