Case Summary
The petitioners, children of Mannil Kunhalan Haji, seek eviction of the respondent Vasu from a shop room for bonafide need. The respondent has not paid rent since January 2015 and has other properties and businesses.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioners within three months.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioners had proven their bonafide need for the shop room.
The court found that the petitioners had proven their bonafide need for the shop room.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under S. 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act as follows: I. The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioners within three months from today.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Marsook (38 years)
Omachapuzha Amsom, Perunchery Desom, Tirur Taluk
Jasim (35 years)
Jameela (47 years)
Safiya (46 years)
Naseema (42 years)
Defendants
Vasu (Age not specified years)
Near Karuna Classic Auditiorium, Poongottukulam, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioners.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed under S. 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act as follows: I. The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioners within three months from today.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
So the petitioner is entitled to realise the cost of the proceedings from respondents.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was issued to demand the surrender of vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was the respondent's reply to the petitioners' lawyer notice, stating untenable contentions.
Reference:
Ext.A2