| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1621 - 1625 of 2446

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Desai Distributors vs Jacob Chaniyil Antony regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1275/2022

Ernakulam

2025-12-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Reema Sujith regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 414/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-23

approximately-0 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Punjab National Bank vs Uma Maheswari.N. et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 759/2023

Ernakulam

2025-12-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Sarath Menon @ Sarad Menon et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 806/2024

Ernakulam

2025-12-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Siraj Ali Mohammed et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1288/2022

Ernakulam

2025-12-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the necessary batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were often dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear or represent themselves.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently did not present sufficient evidence, particularly regarding defendants' means to pay debts.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Pay Court Fees

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's non-payment of required court fees.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Pay Court Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?