Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 414/2025

Case between State Bank of India vs Reema Sujith regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-0 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, is seeking repayment from the defendant, Reema Sujith, who had taken a loan and failed to make proper repayments. The court found in favor of the plaintiff, holding the defendant liable for the amount due.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest. The plaintiff is also granted costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 2,90,369/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest. The plaintiff is also granted costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved through uncontested evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 2,90,369/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. If the defendant do not pay the amount as ordered, the plaintiff shall be at the liberty to realise the same from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reema Sujith
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o. Sri. Sujith
Plaintiffs Documents
Arrangement Letter, Loan -cum - Hypothecation Agreement, Vehicle delivery letter, Certified copy of Judgment in WP(c) No. 26606/2023, Office copy of legal notice, Postal Acknowledgment Card, Computer print out of Statement of Account from 01.01.2018 to 08.04.2025
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.P Jose Pious
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. Sunilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of ₹2,90,369 with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 2,90,369/- (Rupees two lakhs ninety thousand three hundred and sixty nine only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan -cum - Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Vehicle delivery letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of Judgment in WP(c) No. 26606/2023
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Computer print out of Statement of Account from 01.01.2018 to 08.04.2025
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Reema Sujith regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Reema Sujith regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won