Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1288/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Siraj Ali Mohammed et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Siraj Ali Mohammed and M/s Fidha Boutique for recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of Canara Bank, ordering the defendants to pay ₹3,48,315.88 with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
₹3,48,315.88 with 8.88% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of Canara Bank, ordering the defendants to pay ₹3,48,315.88 with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹3,48,315.88/- (Rupees Three Lakh Forty Eight Thousand Three Hundred Fifteen and Eighty Eight paise only), with 8.88% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siraj Ali Mohammed
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Fidha Boutique
Relation
represented by its Proprietor
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction letter, Composite Hypothecation Agreement, Receipt, Acknowledgment of Debt, Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendant, Postal receipts (4 nos), Acknowledgment card, Returned cover (3 nos), Statement of account bearing A/c no. 430599 - 10000110 issued by Canara Bank for the period from 01.07.16 to 28.11.22
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Sreedutt
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court directed the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹3,48,315.88/- (Rupees Three Lakh Forty Eight Thousand Three Hundred Fifteen and Eighty Eight paise only), with 8.88% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the loan sanction for the MSME Term Loan of ₹3,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the terms secured against the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledges receipt of loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the debt liability incurred by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as notification for repayment obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of dispatch of legal notices to defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of correspondence by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates unreceived notices.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the outstanding amount due as per bank records.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Siraj Ali Mohammed et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Siraj Ali Mohammed et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won