Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 759/2023

Case between Punjab National Bank vs Uma Maheswari.N. et al regarding realization of money

Court
The Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Punjab National Bank filed a suit against Uma Maheswari.N. and Sri. Nanddagopal K.A. for defaulting on an education loan of Rs. 4,00,000. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite multiple extensions and notices from the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that Punjab National Bank is entitled to recover an amount of Rs. 4,74,372 from the defendants along with interest. The defendants did not present any evidence to contest the claim.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,74,372 and interest at rates specified.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that Punjab National Bank is entitled to recover an amount of Rs. 4,74,372 from the defendants along with interest. The defendants did not present any evidence to contest the claim.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff's witness and the evidence presented confirmed the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A14 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,74,372/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy Four Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy Two only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Punjab National Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Uma Maheswari.N.
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Nanddagopal K.A.
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan agreement, Original supplementary agreement, Balance and security confirmation letters, Notices
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreejith S. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Remil Regi George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh B. kurup
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,74,372/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,74,372/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy Four Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy Two only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.4,74,372/-.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12 % per annum for Rs.4,74,372/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy Four Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy Two only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,74,372/-.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,74,372/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy Four Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy Two only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from from the defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original loan agreement dated 04.09.2007 was submitted to establish the loan taken by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Supplementary Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original supplementary agreement dated 12.03.2015 was submitted to show an extension of the repayment period.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Supplementary Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original supplementary agreement dated 26.08.2016 was submitted to indicate further extension of the repayment period.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original balance and security confirmation letter dated 01.09.2010 was submitted to establish acknowledgment of debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original balance and security confirmation letter dated 31.07.2013 was submitted to continue the acknowledgment of debt.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original balance and security confirmation letter dated 30.01.2014 was submitted to verify debt acknowledgment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original balance and security confirmation letter dated 26.08.2016 was submitted to confirm acknowledgment of debt.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original balance and security confirmation letter dated 06.06.2019 was submitted to establish debt acknowledgment.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Balance and Security Confirmation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original balance and security confirmation letter dated 01.06.2020 was submitted to reaffirm acknowledgment of debt.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice dated 31.05.2023 was submitted to indicate the initiation of loan recall process.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The legal notice dated 15.07.2023 was submitted to provide formal communication regarding the default.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment card was submitted as evidence of the notice dispatched.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Returned Envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The returned envelope was submitted to show that the notice to the 1st defendant was unserved.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement of account along with certification was submitted to establish the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A14

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Uma Maheswari.N. et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Uma Maheswari.N. et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 07/31/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won