Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 806/2024

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Sarath Menon @ Sarad Menon et al regarding realization of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

IDBI Bank Limited filed a suit against Sarath Menon @ Sarad Menon and others for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount of Rs.8,54,955/- due to defaults in repayment. The defendants failed to appear in court, leading to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of IDBI Bank Limited, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount of Rs.8,54,955/- along with applicable interest rates. The defendants were found liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.8,54,955/- along with interest @10.15% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of IDBI Bank Limited, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount of Rs.8,54,955/- along with applicable interest rates. The defendants were found liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case of default on the loan agreement, having presented valid documentation and testimony that remained unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.8,54,955/- with interest from defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.8,54,955/- along with interest @10.15% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
IDBI Bank Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarath Menon @ Sarad Menon
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T N Kanakakumari
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhi Menon
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyam Kumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Home Loan Agreement dated 30.01.2010, Recall notice dated 21.09.2023, Demand notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act dated 30.10.2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K P Sujeshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Keerthi K Narayan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shalu S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswin B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jeevan Joy
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rahul G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants shall pay Rs.8,54,955/- along with interest to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.8,54,955/- (Rupees Eight lakhs fifty four thousand nine hundred and fifty five only) along with interest @10.15% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are personally liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendants shall be personally and their assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Home Loan Agreement, Power of Attorney, Deed of Guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the loan agreement terms accepted by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document providing evidence of collateral for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter evidencing deposit of title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document confirming the deposit of title deeds as collateral security.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Recall Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued for demanding the repayment of outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Notice under SARFAESI Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued under section 13(2) for recovery of dues.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document providing the financial status of the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Sarath Menon @ Sarad Menon et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Sarath Menon @ Sarad Menon et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won