| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1666 - 1670 of 21900

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Saroja vs Sushanth et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 38/2024

Nadapuram, Kozhikode

2025-03-22

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between MADHUSOODHANAN et al vs JAMAL et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 21/2024

Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-03-24

approximately-1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between MADHUSOODHANAN et al vs JAMAL et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 21/2024

Vatakara Taluk, Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-03-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JAMES. K. P regarding recovery of loan amount.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 23/2025

Nadapuram, Kerala

2025-03-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between RAMLA vs SUBAIR regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 91/2024

Kozhikode district, Kerala

2025-03-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9648

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs failed to provide necessary evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases were often dismissed due to the petitioners' absence during hearings, which prevented their claims from being heard.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary procedural steps, leading to their petitions being dismissed for default.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners

No Steps Taken in Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?