| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1646 - 1650 of 21897

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THOMAS PHILIP regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 107/2024

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-03-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P. Muhammadali vs Ameer Kattaroli regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Criminal Case

S.T. No. 30/2023

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District

2025-03-03

approximately-2 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between MUHAMMAD HARIS vs KABEER. P regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of money

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 86/2024

Nadapuram, Kerala

2025-03-04

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between THE FEDERAL BANK LTD. vs JASNA JOSEPH et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 119/2024

Nadapuram

2025-03-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 64/2024

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District

2025-03-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9647

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to their inability to pay necessary batta for proceeding with cases.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Cases were dismissed due to absence of the plaintiff or their legal representation during proceedings.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs commonly lacked adequate evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs failed to properly issue necessary notices to defendants, contributing to case dismissals.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?