Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 64/2024

Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan.B
Order Date
2025-03-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves CANARA BANK suing V. K. ASHOKAN for the recovery of a loan amounting to ₹ 1,40,604. The defendant defaulted on the repayment, leading the bank to initiate this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of CANARA BANK as the defendant admitted the claim by agreeing to repay the loan amount. The defendant was ordered to pay ₹ 1,40,604 with 10% interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 1,40,604 with future interest @ 10% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of CANARA BANK as the defendant admitted the claim by agreeing to repay the loan amount. The defendant was ordered to pay ₹ 1,40,604 with 10% interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant admitted the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant admitted the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
Since, the defendant has admitted the plaint claim by withdrawing the contentions the suit has to be decreed in favour of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
CANARA BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. K. ASHOKAN
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement for Agricultural Advances executed by Ashokan, Demand Promissory Note, Acknowledgment of Debt and Security, Copy of Lawyer Notice, Statement of Account issued by Canara Bank.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Pooja. A. P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Hareesh. E. Karayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 1,40,604/- from the defendant with future interest @ 10% per annum.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed with costs as follows:- The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 1,40,604/- (Rupees One Lakh Forty Thousand Six Hundred and Four only) from the defendant with future interest @ 10% per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement for Agricultural Advances
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Ashokan. V. K in favour of Plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Ashokan in favour of Plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by Ashokan to Plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent by Adv. A. Santhosh to defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by Canara Bank, Payanthong Branch.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between FEDERAL BANK NADAPURAM BRANCH vs SHARIN LAL regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THOMAS PHILIP regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SUBAIR. A. K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs SUDHEESH. T. K regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MAREENA JOHNY, JOHNY. O. P regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won