Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 21/2024

Case between MADHUSOODHANAN et al vs JAMAL et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan.B
Order Date
2025-03-24
Duration
approximately-1 year
Case Closed
Mon, 03/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners include Madhusoodhanan and others, while the respondents include Jamal and K. Rajeesh. The case involves a rent control petition that has been settled based on terms arrived at during mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The matter has been settled through mediation, and the petition has been allowed based on the terms agreed upon.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
RCP is allowed based on the terms arrived at.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The matter has been settled through mediation, and the petition has been allowed based on the terms agreed upon.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled through mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled through mediation.
Supporting Evidence
The matter was settled through mediation.

Judgment Evidence:

RCP is allowed based on the terms arrived at.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
MADHUSOODHANAN
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A. P. AYISHA
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A. P. RASAQUE
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A. P. HAIRUNNISA
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A. P. NISAR
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
JAMAL
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. RAJEESH
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer Notice sent by Adv. P. Balagopalan to the Respondents, Postal Receipt, Postal Acknowledgment Card signed by Jamal, Postal Acknowledgment Card signed by K. Rajeesh.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Adeep Salih
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
RCP is allowed based on the terms arrived at.
Evidence:
Matter settled. RCP is allowed based on the terms arrived at.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court acknowledged the notice sent to the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The receipt corroborates the sending of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A1 (a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This acknowledgment confirms receipt of the notice by Jamal.
Reference:
Ext.A1 (b)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This acknowledgment confirms receipt of the notice by K. Rajeesh.
Reference:
Ext.A1 (c)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Witness Aboobacker Haji was examined, providing oral evidence for the petitioners.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between MADHUSOODHANAN et al vs JAMAL et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between MADHUSOODHANAN et al vs JAMAL et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/11/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 03/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Geetha et al vs T. Prabhakaran regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between KUNJIPARAMBATH MANISHA. K. P et al vs SUDHEESH regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini vs Chandra Kurup regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Partial
Case between MADHUSOODHANAN et al vs JAMAL et al regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between AHAMAD MEKKARA THAZHA KUNIYIL vs NISAR KIZHAKKAYIL regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won