Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 26/2024

Case between Geetha et al vs T. Prabhakaran regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, including Geetha and others, are involved in a rent control petition against the respondent T. Prabhakaran. The matter was settled, and a compromise was recorded.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The matter was settled with a compromise recorded, leading to the closure of the rent control petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The matter was settled with a compromise recorded, leading to the closure of the rent control petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners achieved a settlement through recorded compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners achieved a settlement through recorded compromise.
Supporting Evidence
The matter was settled and a compromise was recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

Matter settled. Compromise recorded. IA 2/2025 allowed. RCP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ragisha
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajinya
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Neena
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
NimmyA
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T. Prabhakaran
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Najeesh Paniyil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Megha. M. N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Adithya Satheesan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Shijina Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Matter settled and compromise recorded.
Evidence:
Matter settled. Compromise recorded. IA 2/2025 allowed. RCP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Geetha et al vs T. Prabhakaran regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Geetha et al vs T. Prabhakaran regarding Rent Control Petition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between KUNJIPARAMBATH MANISHA. K. P et al vs SUDHEESH regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini vs Chandra Kurup regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Partial
Case between MADHUSOODHANAN et al vs JAMAL et al regarding Rent Control Petition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between MADHUSOODHANAN et al vs JAMAL et al regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between AHAMAD MEKKARA THAZHA KUNIYIL vs NISAR KIZHAKKAYIL regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won