Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.1081/2019

Case between Smt. Jessy et al vs Smt. Bhargavi et al regarding division of property

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha.K.Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-16
Duration
Case Code No.
1081
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Smt. Jessy and others, filed a petition to pass a final decree to divide the property according to a preliminary decree. The defendants include Smt. Bhargavi and others, and they were absent during the latest hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by the plaintiffs for a final decree was dismissed as not pressed, with no costs awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the plaintiffs for a final decree was dismissed as not pressed, with no costs awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

FDA dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt. Jessy
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o. Late. T.K. Purushothaman
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt. Praveena. T.P.
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o Sri. Saju
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt. Pranitha. T.P.
Party Age
30
Relation
W/o Sri Nithin
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Bhargavi
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o Late Vasu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Radakrishnan
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o Late Vasu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Akhila Kumari
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o Sri. Vinayan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Shyla Purushothaman
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o Sri. Purushothaman
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Aravinthakshan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o Late Karthyayini
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreekala.C.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.R. Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Final decree in terms of the preliminary decree to divide the petition schedule property into 32 equal shares.
Evidence:
this court may be pleased to pass a final decree in the above suit in terms of the preliminary decree to divide the petition schedule property in to 32 equal shares

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh et al vs Sala P Paulose regarding Restoration Petition
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ansari Abdul Kareem vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Supportsages Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Binu Varghese regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Raj R Nath regarding restoration of ex parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won