Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No. 586/2020

Case between Santhosh et al vs Sala P Paulose regarding Restoration Petition

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-25
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Code No.
586
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a restoration petition filed by the plaintiffs Santhosh and Anitha S Varma against the defendant Sala P Paulose. The matter was settled successfully through mediation, leading to the allowance of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the restoration petition and set aside the ex-parte decree dated 31.08.22, indicating a favorable outcome for the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition and set aside the ex-parte decree dated 31.08.22, indicating a favorable outcome for the plaintiffs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Mediation report received as successful, leading to a settlement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Mediation report received as successful, leading to a settlement.
Supporting Evidence
Mediation report received as successful. Matter settled.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is allowed. Exparte decree dated 31.08.22 is set aside.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhosh
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anitha S Varma
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sala P Paulose
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Helen Paulose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bibin Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saumya T S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition for restoration is allowed and the exparte decree is set aside.
Evidence:
Mediation report received as successful. Matter settled. Hence petition is allowed. Exparte decree dated 31.08.22 is set aside.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 08/31/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between K C Josey vs Paul M U et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devassy alias Thomas vs V P Rajamma regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ansari Abdul Kareem vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Supportsages Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Binu Varghese regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Raj R Nath regarding restoration of ex parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won