Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No. 418/2021

Case between Supportsages Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Binu Varghese regarding restoration of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-21
Duration
Case Code No.
418
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Supportsages Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a restoration petition for a suit that was rejected due to non-payment of court fees. The defendant, Binu Varghese, contested the maintainability of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition for restoration of the suit was dismissed by the court based on issues of maintainability regarding the prior rejection for non-payment of balance court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for restoration of the suit was dismissed by the court based on issues of maintainability regarding the prior rejection for non-payment of balance court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was found to be not maintainable as alternative remedies were available.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was found to be not maintainable as alternative remedies were available.
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that the power under S. 151 of CPC cannot be applied by this court to restore the suit which is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Supportsages Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binu Varghese
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rahul Kandampully
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Raaga Ramalakshmi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishal Ajayan V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Restoration of suit which was rejected for non payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
this petition is not maintainable and has no merits. Hence, court is not inclined to allow this petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between K C Josey vs Paul M U et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devassy alias Thomas vs V P Rajamma regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh et al vs Sala P Paulose regarding Restoration Petition
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ansari Abdul Kareem vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Raj R Nath regarding restoration of ex parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won