Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.1337/2018

Case between Ansari Abdul Kareem vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding restoration of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 days
Case Code No.
1337
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Ansari Abdul Kareem, is seeking to restore a suit that was dismissed for default due to his absence. The petitioner was unable to attend court because of health issues that rendered him bedridden.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to restore the previously dismissed suit, setting aside the default dismissal order and permitting the plaintiff to contest the suit on merits.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to restore the previously dismissed suit, setting aside the default dismissal order and permitting the plaintiff to contest the suit on merits.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient cause for the plaintiff's absence and determined that the failure to appear was not willful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient cause for the plaintiff's absence and determined that the failure to appear was not willful.
Supporting Evidence
This court has found that there is sufficiency of cause for condoning delay. This court is satisfied that there is sufficient ground for allowing the above petition in the interest of justice.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the above petition is allowed. Order dated 20.01.2023 dismissing the above suit for default is set aside and suit restored to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ansari Abdul Kareem
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Greater Cochin Development Authority
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P A Abdul Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
D M Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed and the suit is restored.
Evidence:
The above petition is allowed. Order dated 20.01.2023 dismissing the above suit for default is set aside and suit restored to file.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between K C Josey vs Paul M U et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devassy alias Thomas vs V P Rajamma regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh et al vs Sala P Paulose regarding Restoration Petition
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Supportsages Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Binu Varghese regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Raj R Nath regarding restoration of ex parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won