Case Summary
This case involves a restoration petition filed by Shanto against Nishad Mathew concerning a counter claim related to a bill amount for materials purchased by Mathew's wife for her hotel. The counter claim was dismissed for default due to Shanto's absence, prompting the restoration petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds for allowing the petition due to reasons stated in the affidavit.
The court found sufficient grounds for allowing the petition due to reasons stated in the affidavit.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, 1) The above petition is allowed. Order dated 03.09.2024 dismissing the above counter claim for default is set aside and Counter claim restored to file.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Shanto (59 years years)
SIDCO Industrial Park, Champannoor, Angamaly South P O, Ernakulam-683573
Defendants
Nishad Mathew (Age not specified years)
Flat No. 28, Skyline Gateway, S Kalamassery, NH-47, Pathadippalam, Edappally South, Kochi-682024
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restore the counter claim to file after setting aside the order dismissing it for default.
Evidence:
In light of the above discussion, this court is satisfied that the above petition is liable to be allowed.