Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.1444/2019

Case between Shanto vs Nishad Mathew regarding restoration of counter claim

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-12-05
Duration
approximately-3 years 48 days
Case Code No.
1444
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a restoration petition filed by Shanto against Nishad Mathew concerning a counter claim related to a bill amount for materials purchased by Mathew's wife for her hotel. The counter claim was dismissed for default due to Shanto's absence, prompting the restoration petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to restore the counter claim was allowed, and the previous dismissal for default was set aside.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition to restore the counter claim was allowed, and the previous dismissal for default was set aside.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds for allowing the petition due to reasons stated in the affidavit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient grounds for allowing the petition due to reasons stated in the affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
On perusing records, this court is satisfied that the failure of counter claim plaintiff to adduce evidence on 03.09.2024 is due to the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and not due to the willful failure of counter claim plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1) The above petition is allowed. Order dated 03.09.2024 dismissing the above counter claim for default is set aside and Counter claim restored to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shanto
Party Age
59
Relation
Proprietor
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nishad Mathew
Relation
S/o K T Mathew
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Julian Xavier J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restore the counter claim to file after setting aside the order dismissing it for default.
Evidence:
In light of the above discussion, this court is satisfied that the above petition is liable to be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 10/18/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Devassy alias Thomas vs V P Rajamma regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh et al vs Sala P Paulose regarding Restoration Petition
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ansari Abdul Kareem vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Supportsages Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Binu Varghese regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Raj R Nath regarding restoration of ex parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won