Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No.161/2022

Case between Issac Peter vs Ayinul Abeed P.A. regarding eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-02-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Issac Peter has filed a petition for eviction against Ayinul Abeed P.A. for default in payment of rent. The respondent has failed to pay the rent despite multiple demands from the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction has been allowed, and the respondent is ordered to put the petitioner in possession of the property within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building
Case Type
R.C.P.
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent committed default in paying the monthly rent and has accumulated arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed with costs as follows. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(ii)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Issac Peter (75 years years) Kureethadam House, N.H. Bye Pass, Palarivattom, Cochin-682025

Defendants

Ayinul Abeed P.A. (61 years years) Palliyakath House, now residing in H-3, West Rock Apartments, Pachalam P.O., Kchi-682018

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ordered the respondent to vacate the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed with costs as follows. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(ii)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitled the petitioner to recover costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demanded the payment of the arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response to the lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sought payment of arrears of rent after the respondent continued to default.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demanded the payment of arrears of rent with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Offered a payment plan in response to the plaintiff's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office Copy of Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document regarding the communication of payment arrangement.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demanded payment of further arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt for the lawyer notice sent.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Document submitted by the Advocate Commissioner regarding possession.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 04/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases