Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 69/2019

Case between Pau! John Chakola et al vs M/s. P.K.V. Traders et al regarding Rent Control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-05-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners include Pau! John Chakola and others who filed for a compromise under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act against M/s. P.K.V. Traders. The court considered the compromise terms and allowed the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise petition, ordering the terms to be lawful and effective under the relevant Rent Control Act.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
R.C.P.
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise petition, ordering the terms to be lawful and effective under the relevant Rent Control Act.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
The terms of compromise were found lawful after a perusal and hearing with both sides represented.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 04/2025 is allowed. Hence an order is passed under Section 5 and Section 11(2)(b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (VSO).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pau! John Chakola
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rosamma Thommy Chakola
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Diya Thommy Chakola
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paul Thommy Chakola
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. P.K.V. Traders
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Jacob Sunny
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Basil Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.V. John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suja R. Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Theresia Anu P.J.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order passed under Section 5 and Section 11(2)(b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Evidence:
Thus IA 04/2025 is allowed. Hence an order is passed under Section 5 and Section 11(2)(b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (VSO).

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise petition
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Allowed as compromise petition after perusal and found lawful.
Reference:
IA 04/2025

Case Classification

Case Type
R.C.P.
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pau! John Chakola et al vs M/s. P.K.V. Traders et al regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Pau! John Chakola et al vs M/s. P.K.V. Traders et al regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Issac Peter vs Ayinul Abeed P.A. regarding eviction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
R.C.P. Plaintiff Won
Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won