Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.630/2015

Case between Gokulan et al vs Premalatha.M regarding Restoration of a suit dismissed for default.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-08-29
Duration
approximately-1 year 7 months
Case Code No.
630
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Gokulan, Anil R., and Vandana, are seeking to restore a suit they filed against the defendant, Premalatha.M, which was dismissed for default. The plaintiffs argue that their failure to appear was due to valid reasons, including health issues.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the plaintiffs' petitions to restore the suit and condoned the delay in filing, stating there were sufficient reasons for the plaintiffs' absence. The suit has been restored to file.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Costs of Rs.1500/- to defendants within 7 days; suit restored to file.
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the plaintiffs' petitions to restore the suit and condoned the delay in filing, stating there were sufficient reasons for the plaintiffs' absence. The suit has been restored to file.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient reasons for the plaintiffs' absence and determined that the delay was not willful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient reasons for the plaintiffs' absence and determined that the delay was not willful.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the failure of plaintiffs to appear before court is due to the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and not due to the willful failure of plaintiffs.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 1/2023 is allowed. Delay of 224 days is condoned. RP 135/2023 is allowed. Order dated 03.01.2023 dismissing the suit for default is set aside on payment of costs of Rs.1500/- to defendants within 7 days. Suit restored to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gokulan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anil R.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vandana
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Premalatha.M
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.V. Manuvilsan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anilkumar P.C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.Vidhya
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Santhosh.G.Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswathy.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Delay of 224 days is condoned.
Evidence:
IA 1/2023 is allowed. Delay of 224 days is condoned.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order dated 03.01.2023 dismissing the suit for default is set aside.
Evidence:
RP 135/2023 is allowed. Order dated 03.01.2023 dismissing the suit for default is set aside on payment of costs of Rs.1500/- to defendants within 7 days.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Devassy alias Thomas vs V P Rajamma regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh et al vs Sala P Paulose regarding Restoration Petition
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ansari Abdul Kareem vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Supportsages Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Binu Varghese regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Raj R Nath regarding restoration of ex parte decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won