| Niyamam AI

Displaying 321 - 325 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Haris et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 324/2019

Kollam

2025-07-31

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Tossy Cyril et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 556/2019

Kollam

2025-08-01

approximately-6 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Canara Bank vs Shajana.S. et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 271/2024

Kollam

2025-07-31

approximately-10 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Punjab & Sind Bank vs Nijana Nasarudeen regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 79/2022

Kollam

2025-08-05

approximately-9 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sarala et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 169/2025

Kollam

2025-08-05

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary court fees leading to case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Dismissals were common when plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural actions.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Court dismissals occurred when petitioners were not present for hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?