| Niyamam AI

Displaying 311 - 315 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sadasivan vs Shiju regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 815/2023

Kollam

2025-07-30

approximately-3 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunjumol et al vs Jancy et al regarding setting aside documents and partition

Civil Suit

OS. No. 916/2018

Kollam

2025-07-30

approximately-6 years 11 months 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Latha vs Saraswathy regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 584/2022

Kollam

2025-07-30

approximately-3 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Adv.V.Vinayachandran et al vs Gayathri Devi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 166/2023

Kollam

2025-07-30

approximately-2 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kamalamma et al vs Sreejan et al regarding injunction and temple administration

Injunction

OS.No. 279/2025

Kollam

2025-07-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently dismissed for failing to pay necessary batta for proceedings.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not sufficiently present evidence to support financial capability of respondents.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Cases dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking required procedural steps in a timely manner.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Numerous cases dismissed because the petitioner was not present in court when required.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?