| Niyamam AI

Displaying 20471 - 20475 of 21888

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kuttu @ Bava vs Shameermon et al regarding recovery of possession and injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 44 OF 2016

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Fathima.K.K vs Saithalikuttty et al regarding delivery of property

Execution Proceedings

EP 215/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-02-08

0 years, 4 months, 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 268 OF 2016

2017-02-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunnakkadan Abdul Azeez et al vs Islamic Service Front Committee et al regarding injunction

Suit for Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 137 OF 2014

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Narendran vs Gangadharan Tharayil, Dr.P.A. Radhakrishnan regarding injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 457 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-02-07

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Absence of Evidence

Lack of sufficient evidence to prove claims or allegations resulted in dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Dismissing cases due to the plaintiff's absence or lack of representation at hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?