Case Summary
Narendran filed a suit for injunction against Gangadharan Tharayil and Dr.P.A. Radhakrishnan. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and his counsel's lack of instructions.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's counsel submitted that he has no instruction from his client. Hence name of plaintiff called. Absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Narendran
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gangadharan Tharayil
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dr.P.A. Radhakrishnan
- Party Age
- 53
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K. Anil Lal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff sought an injunction, but the suit was dismissed due to absence.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Narendran vs Gangadharan Tharayil, Dr.P.A. Radhakrishnan regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Narendran vs Gangadharan Tharayil, Dr.P.A. Radhakrishnan regarding injunction