Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 137 OF 2014

Case between Kunnakkadan Abdul Azeez et al vs Islamic Service Front Committee et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-02-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Kunnakkadan Abdul Azeez and Indiveettil Abdul Jaleel, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, which include the Islamic Service Front Committee. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Suit for Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were absent and had no representation in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Name of the plaintiff called absent. No representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunnakkadan Abdul Azeez
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indiveettil Abdul Jaleel
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Islamic Service Front Committee
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.P. Muhammed Basheer
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary, Cheriyamundam Gramapanchayath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.V. Sabir
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Vijayaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. E.K. Noushad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit for injunction
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Suit for Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunnakkadan Abdul Azeez et al vs Islamic Service Front Committee et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kunnakkadan Abdul Azeez et al vs Islamic Service Front Committee et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Chatheri Mammad vs Moideenkutty et al regarding injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Suit for injunction Defendant Won
Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nadambadi Santhakumari vs Secretary regarding unspecified matter
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Dispute Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won