Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 253 OF 2016

Case between Chatheri Mammad vs Moideenkutty et al regarding injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.SUSHAMA.P.
Order Date
2019-06-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chatheri Mammad filed a suit against Moideenkutty and others for injunction. The court rejected the suit due to balance court fee not being paid and lack of instructions from the plaintiff's counsel.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to unpaid court fees and lack of counsel instructions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Suit for injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Balance court fee not paid and counsel for the plaintiff reported no instructions.

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 4th day of June, 2019.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Chatheri Mammad (53 years) Chatheri House, Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Moideenkutty (65 years) Chatheri House, Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom, Tirur Taluk The Executive Engineer (Age not specified years) Public Work Department, Thazhepalam, Tirur Kunhimoideen (66 years) Chatheri House, Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit for injunction
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases