| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 6536 - 6540 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 90 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary Ozhur Service Co-operative Bank vs Naushad et al regarding EP 56/2018

Civil Suit - Execution Petition

EP 56/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-11-01

0 years, 8 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Hassainar et al vs Valiyakath Muhammed's children et al regarding Partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 89 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-10-31

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dr. Krtty's Health Care 2/465 Saleema Hospital Complex, Rep. By its Partner Vellekkattu Niyas vs Kariyil Surendran, Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd. et al regarding setting aside exparte decree

Civil Procedure

Original Suit No. 89 OF 2017

2019-12-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jayaraj vs Pathekkara Parambil deceased Narayanan's Children et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 100 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-10-31

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying required batta fees before court proceedings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often could not present sufficient evidence to prove financial means or case merits.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

No Steps Taken for Proceedings

Many plaintiffs neglected to take necessary procedural steps, leading to automatic case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Several cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during critical court sessions.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken for Proceedings

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?