Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 100 OF 2016

Case between Jayaraj vs Pathekkara Parambil deceased Narayanan's Children et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-10-31
Duration
2 years
Case Closed
Wed, 10/31/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Jayaraj sought partition of properties originally belonging to Oruppulassery Mana among himself and defendants, who are legal heirs of Narayanan.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court passed a preliminary decree for partition. The plaintiff received a 2/4 share, Defendants 1-6 each received 1/4 share, and Defendant 7 received 1/4 share.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of plaint B schedule property
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a preliminary decree for partition. The plaintiff received a 2/4 share, Defendants 1-6 each received 1/4 share, and Defendant 7 received 1/4 share.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved his right over the plaint B schedule properties through surrender deeds and purchase certificates, establishing his entitlement to a 2/4 share.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved his right over the plaint B schedule properties through surrender deeds and purchase certificates, establishing his entitlement to a 2/4 share.
Supporting Evidence
Ext A1 is the Surrender Deed No.4394/2015 of SRO Tirur and Ext A2 is the another Surrender Deed NO.107/2016 of SRO Tirur. Ext A1 is the Purchase Certificate...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Preliminary decree is passed as follows: 1. That the plaint B schedule property shall partitioned into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayaraj
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o Kizhakkepurakkal Padmanabhan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Velayudhan
Party Age
55
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasudevan
Party Age
54
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Seetha
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o Kottiyori Gopi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Visalakshi
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o Chandran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suseela
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o Theyyattil Parambil Sukumaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnan
Party Age
38
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karuvancheri Achunni @ Parangodan
Party Age
80
Relation
S/o Cheethamma
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Purchase Certificate, Surrender Deed No.4394/2015 of SRO Tirur, Surrender Deed NO.107/2016 of SRO Tirur
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vipin Chandrasekhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Mehroof Shihab
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Dinesh Pookkayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Sreehari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaint B schedule property shall partitioned into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds.
Evidence:
In the result, Preliminary decree is passed as follows: 1. That the plaint B schedule property shall partitioned into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff received 2 out of 4 shares, Defendants No.1-6 each received 1 out of 4 shares, and Defendant No.7 received 1 out of 4 shares in the property.
Evidence:
In the result, Preliminary decree is passed as follows: 1. That the plaint B schedule property shall partitioned into 4 equal shares by metes and bounds...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established plaintiff's right over the properties.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Surrender Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reinforced plaintiff's claim for partition.
Reference:
A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition of property
Case Code
Case between Jayaraj vs Pathekkara Parambil deceased Narayanan's Children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Jayaraj vs Pathekkara Parambil deceased Narayanan's Children et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 10/31/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 10/31/2018 - 12:00
From
Mon, 10/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Wed, 10/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kadiyumma vs Pathummakutty et al. regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rafeeq vs Fathimakkutty Umma et al regarding partition of property
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Valavath Hamza et al vs Valavath Mammikkutty et al regarding property partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff and defendant
Case between Valavath Hamza et al vs Valavath Mammikkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won