Case Summary
Case involves a petition filed to set aside an exparte decree against the 4th defendant in Original Suit No. 89/2017. The respondent/plaintiff opposed the application.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
Petition to set aside exparte decree is allowed and deposit of cost is ordered.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. Krtty's Health Care 2/465 Saleema Hospital Complex, Rep. By its Partner Vellekkattu Niyas
- Relation
- Partner
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kariyil Surendran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayachandran
- Relation
- Managing Director
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Gafoor
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopalakrishnan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S/o Mammadu kutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Set aside the exparte decree dated 31.10.2018
Evidence:
The exparte decree passed against the petitioner is to be set aside in the interest of justice. But the grievance of the respondent/plaintiff is to be obviated by imposing cost
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr. Krtty's Health Care 2/465 Saleema Hospital Complex, Rep. By its Partner Vellekkattu Niyas vs Kariyil Surendran, Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd. et al regarding setting aside exparte decree
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. Krtty's Health Care 2/465 Saleema Hospital Complex, Rep. By its Partner Vellekkattu Niyas vs Kariyil Surendran, Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd. et al regarding setting aside exparte decree