Case Summary
Rent control petition filed by Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim, represented by Erachampattu Haneefa, against M.Sreenivasan, was dismissed as not pressed by petitioner's counsel.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner's counsel endorsed not pressed. Hence petition dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.Sreenivasan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.P.Basheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.I.V.Rathish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Dismissed
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition filed under section 5 of Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act, 1965 was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding rent control petition