Private Individual

Canara Bank is the plaintiff seeking to recover a sum of Rs. 8,74,625 from the defendants, which includes future interest and costs. The cause of action arose from events in December 2021 and May 2024.

Kavilumpara Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society is the petitioner seeking payment of a decree debt. The respondents have agreed to pay the amount in installments.

The case involves a complaint by Kavitha M. M. against Kunnummal Sathyan V. V. for dishonor of a cheque amounting to Rs. 8,00,000. The accused was accused of failing to pay the complainant after a cheque was issued and subsequently dishonored.

The Kerala Gramin Bank filed a petition against Abdul Salam regarding an execution petition. The court dismissed the petition for want of steps.

Canara Bank filed an execution petition against Fazil K. K and Ayisha V. P regarding the enforcement of a decree. The court noted that the decree holder had not taken necessary steps to proceed with the sale of the property.

The State of Kerala is the petitioner in this case against Muhammad M P and Hashim Koya K. The case involves the imposition of a penalty on the sureties.

Sri. Gokulam Chits and Finance Ltd is the complainant represented by P. K. Sudheesh Kumar. The case involves accusations under the Negotiable Instruments Act, but it was settled with the cheque amount received by the complainant.

This case involves the State of Kerala as the petitioner and Kunji Soopy and Rabiya as respondents. The matter was settled, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.

The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.

HAMEED HAJI and others are plaintiffs suing VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent trespassing into their property and related acts. The case arose due to actions taken by the defendants on 18-11-2024.