Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 94/2024

Case between CANARA BANK vs SRUTHI. B regarding Suit for realization of money

Court
MUNSIFF COURT, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-11-21
Duration
approximately-1 year 2 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is the plaintiff seeking to recover a sum of Rs. 8,74,625 from the defendants, which includes future interest and costs. The cause of action arose from events in December 2021 and May 2024.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the matter to be settled in mediation and decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation arrived at.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
That the Suit be decreed as per the terms of mediation arrived at.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the matter to be settled in mediation and decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation arrived at.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court recognized the mediation terms agreed upon by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court recognized the mediation terms agreed upon by both parties.

Judgment Evidence:

That the Matter be settled in mediation. That the Suit be decreed as per the terms of mediation arrived at. That the Terms of mediation do form the part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
CANARA BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SRUTHI. B
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SRUTHI. B
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Pooja. A. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. P. Surendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Hrishikesh. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Matter be settled in mediation.
Evidence:
1)That the Matter be settled in mediation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit be decreed as per the terms of mediation arrived at.
Evidence:
2)That the Suit be decreed as per the terms of mediation arrived at.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Terms of mediation do form the part of decree.
Evidence:
3)That the Terms of mediation do form the part of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Court fee and legal benefit fund be Refunded.
Evidence:
4)That the court fee and legal benefit fund be Refund.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between CANARA BANK vs SRUTHI. B regarding Suit for realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between CANARA BANK vs SRUTHI. B regarding Suit for realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 09/28/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ASHRAF. M regarding suit not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs SIJU THOMAS regarding settlement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JAMES. K. P regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won