Private Individual

Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. is the complainant in this case against Sabitha under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was represented and ultimately acquitted.

Rajappan filed a suit against MuraleedharanNair and others for declaration of his rights over certain properties and to restrain them from trespassing. The defendants contested the allegations and denied the claims made by the plaintiff.

Rajappan filed a suit seeking declaration of ownership and injunction against MuraleedharanNair and others. The suit involves disputes over property and allegations of fraudulent deeds.

The plaintiff, M/s Mathew and Sons Finance, engaged in money lending, filed a suit against the defendants for non-repayment of a loan of ₹4,00,000. The defendants defaulted on repayments despite receiving legal notice.

The plaintiff, M/S Mathew and sons Finance, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants who defaulted on payments. The court found that the defendants did not present any rebuttal evidence.

The petitioners, Sajan V K and Kusal P Anand, filed a petition to condone the delay in filing a restoration petition. The court found that the petitioner did not provide sufficient reasons or medical certification for the delay.

The case involves Self Employers Service society as the decree holder and Benny P D along with others as judgment debtors. The court has decided to transfer the decree to Munsiff Court, Kanjirappally.

The petitioners, Ninan Daniel and his children, are seeking a succession certificate for the shares of their deceased relative, Smt. Annamma Ninan, who passed away intestate. The court examined the details of the shares and the relationships among the parties involved.

The case involves Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd. as the petitioner seeking restoration against multiple respondents including Anuraj .G. and others. The petition has been finally heard and the court has issued an order regarding its closure.

Korah C.George filed a suit against GTL Infrastructure Limited. The court examined the maintainability of the suit and decided to refer the matter to an arbitrator.